Subscribe to the Rosenblog!

Friday, March 31, 2006

Check Us Out!


The news gods smile upon us today with this fantastic NYT Escapes piece by Curtis Sittenfeld. For a museum that has serious "visibility issues," this is very welcome coverage. Thank you news gods!

...and yes, there will be corrections. Most significantly--the Sendak collection is not an "acquisition." We don't own it. Mr. Sendak's drawings are on deposit at the museum (save a handful of pieces we do own). Also, the Dracula notes weren't purchased by the brothers--they were purchased by the museum in the 1970's, long after they had died. And just in case you didn't read inside the fold, we don't have Napoleon's penis anymore.

But if you haven't visited the Rosenbach--come now before the crowds do! [we hope.]

Tuesday, March 28, 2006

Lot in Sodom in the Rosenbach


Check out this stunning movie still from James Sibley Watson’s and Melville Webber’s Lot in Sodom found in the Marianne Moore papers. The 1933 short film tells the story of Sodom and Gomorrah (Genesis, Ch. 19) in what appears to be fine avant-garde style.

When not making experimental films (his only other film, also made with Webber, The Fall of the House of Usher, is in the Library of Congress’s National Registry of Film), the wealthy doctor Watson was the co-owner of The Dial magazine. Marianne Moore edited The Dial in the late 1920s and became a close friend of Watson’s wife Hildegarde. Hildegarde plays the ill-fated wife of Lot in the film. She presumably gave this still and a few others to Moore.

Hildegarde is on the right in the image above. The sword-brandishing figure in the middle may be one of the angel's sent to visit Lot and destroy Sodom (or maybe both angels?) And is that Lot's daughter on the left? One of the two virgin daughters he offered up to the angry mob of Sodomites who surrounded his house and insisted upon getting to know his heavenly visitors?

I don't know. Before I say anything more, I’d better track down a copy and actually watch the film. I'll report back and let you know who's who.

Monday, March 27, 2006

Dr. A. S. W. Rosenbach quoted in NYTimes

The following is an article published in the New York Times:

Essay
Books to Chew On
By BLAKE ESKIN
Published: March 26, 2006

FOR certain voracious readers, April 1 has become a red-letter day: It's the one time of the year when they get to eat books. They won't eat just any book, only those prepared especially for the occasion, known as the Edible Books Festival and celebrated in libraries, bookstores, galleries and private homes around the world. Judith A. Hoffberg, a California librarian, came up with the concept over Thanksgiving dinner back in 1999 and decided it would be best observed on April Fools' Day, which also turns out to be the birthday of the French gastronome Jean Anthelme Brillat-Savarin, author of "The Physiology of Taste" (1825). Hoffberg describes the festival as a low-key affair: "From 2 to 4 p.m., one looks at the books, and takes photographs, and oohs and aahs. And at 4, you serve tea and serve the books."

Now in its seventh year, the Edible Books Festival has spread to 28 states and 15 other countries. In past years, much of what's been served (pictures can be found at books2eat.com) is book-shaped cake. Other edible books might not go so well with tea, but at least you can turn pages made of sliced bread, seaweed, cold cuts, pea pods or thinly sliced rutabaga. Every once in a while, edible books get political: one West Coast environmentalist incised earth-hugging quotations into leaves of heritage lettuce, and a women's collective from Chiapas used native dyes to write "hunger" on a bunch of tortillas. Most, however, respect the foolishness of the day. Last year, Carolyn Weigel, a librarian at Ursinus College in Pennsylvania, arranged strips of bacon in the shape of France — a tribute to Francis Bacon, who wrote, "Some books are to be tasted, others to be swallowed, and some few to be chewed and digested."

Bacon wasn't actually telling his readers to eat books, any more than Weigel, Hoffberg or other librarians taking part in the festival would suggest a patron wolf down an item from their collection. As a metaphor, book-eating (or bibliophagy, to use the five-dollar word) has flourished over the centuries, invoked by everyone from Elizabeth I, who nourished her soul on "goodlie greene herbes" plucked from the New Testament, to the television chef Tyler Florence, who titled his latest cookbook "Eat This Book." It's an attention-grabbing title (and a popular one, shared by everything from a campy 1980's diet manual to a forthcoming dispatch from the competitive-eating circuit), but Florence lets his fans off the hook. "You don't actually have to eat this book," he writes in his introduction, a point I assumed would be obvious until I read the introduction to "Don't Eat This Book" (2005) by the director of "Super Size Me," Morgan Spurlock: "We put so many things in our mouths, we constantly have to be reminded what not to eat." Fast food, sure, but books? People don't eat books — they're bland and dry, plus the cellulose fiber in paper is indigestible. Or do they?

There are two instances of bibliophagy in the Bible. The first comes in Ezekiel, when a heavenly hand offers the prophet a scroll covered on both sides with "lamentations, and moaning and woe." God commands Ezekiel to eat the scroll, and he reports that "it was in my mouth as honey for sweetness." Revelation, Chapter 10, has a variation on this theme: an angel hands John a scroll to eat, telling him it will taste like honey but also "turn your stomach sour." According to the theologian Eugene H. Peterson, the author of yet another "Eat This Book" (2006), the scroll became the source of John's apocalyptic vision: "The book he ate was metabolized into the book he wrote." For Peterson, this episode illustrates lectio divina, a spiritual mode of reading "that enters our souls as food enters our stomachs, spreads through our blood, and becomes holiness and love and wisdom."

Peterson stops short of telling Christians to snack on the Bible, and some ministers tell the cautionary (and spurious) tale of Menelik II, the Ethiopian king who supposedly self-medicated with a few pages of Scripture whenever he fell ill and eventually died from an overdose of I Kings. Some religions, meanwhile, do quite literally put words in their followers' mouths. Tibetans ingest printed or written mantras as a treatment for epilepsy, or as a preventive measure akin to a multivitamin. And when ultra-Orthodox Jewish boys are about to start school, they undergo a ritual in which the 3-year-old initiate licks honey off a slate showing the Hebrew alphabet, then eats a cake adorned with a quotation from Isaiah and a hard-boiled egg inscribed with the aforementioned verse from Ezekiel.

Of course, nobody needs to teach children how to eat books. "A young child's attitude toward a book is not unlike that of a cannibal toward a missionary," wrote A. S. W. Rosenbach, the noted book collector, who cited bibliophagy as one reason that so few first editions of early children's classics have survived. It's probably too early to tell whether my year-old son's propensity to gum the board books in his library will develop into a refined literary palate, but there's hope. Margaria Fichtner, The Miami Herald's former book critic, once recalled how as a child she had gobbled a few pages of "Johnny Had a Nickel" "because I became so absorbed in whether the hero was going to buy an ice cream cone," and Maurice Sendak remembers cutting his teeth on "The Prince and the Pauper." An "Eat This Book" for children appeared in 2002, with potato-starch pages and a food-coloring pen, but the paper has an unpleasant, artificial-vanilla flavor that lingers in the mouth. No wonder it's fallen out of print.

Bibliophagy seems to become less common after elementary school. A recent episode of "Grey's Anatomy" featured a frustrated novelist who ate an unpublished manuscript that had to be surgically removed. A layman's search of the medical literature, however, yielded only a solitary French article from 1951 that defined la bibilophagie as a psychological disorder that manifests itself by reading "anything, anywhere, anyhow." The British bibliophile Holbrook Jackson, in "The Anatomy of Bibliomania" (1930), says he searched in vain for "any serious study of the dietetics of literature, or any evidence of research into this curious subject."

But Jackson apparently never stumbled upon the work of Carlo Mascaretti (1855-1928), an Italian editor who wrote a column under the anagrammatic pseudonym Americo Scarlatti. He devoted an entire column to bibliophagy and provided several historical examples. The 17th century, in particular, seems to have been a golden age of coercive bibliophagy: the Danish author of a denunciation of Sweden staved off beheading by eating his book boiled in soup; the Duke of Saxony forced the satirist Isaac Volmar to eat his lampoon of the duke raw; the German jurist Philip Oldenburger suffered through a whipping that ended only when he had polished off every morsel of a pamphlet that offended a prince. Peter Greenaway presented a gory vision of this literal-minded punishment in "The Cook, the Thief, His Wife and Her Lover," but if this form of torture persists today, it's not exactly a major concern for PEN or Amnesty International.

In 1966, John Latham, a British artist who often used books — intact, painted, cut-up, burned — as materials in his work, invited his art-school students to a happening called "Still and Chew." They chewed up pages of Clement Greenberg's "Art and Culture," taken from the school library, then spat his influential essays into a flask, where they were mixed with sulfuric acid, baking soda and yeast. Months later, when an overdue notice arrived, Latham turned in a glass vial filled with the fermented results. He lost his job, but the documentation of his experiment, from the Greenberg grappa to his letter of dismissal, is enshrined in the permanent collection at MoMA. And last month in Discover magazine, Homaro Cantu of the Chicago restaurant Moto — which prints its menus in soy ink on Parmesan-flecked rice paper — shared his vision of "dispensing vitamin-enriched edible books in regions where people suffer from malnutrition."
But for now, eating books remains a stunt, a punishment, an act of devotion, a habit of infants and other members of the animal kingdom — bookworms, rodents, goats and at least one fish, caught in 1626 off the coast of England. It had supposedly swallowed the writings of John Frith, a Protestant martyr, which were subsequently republished as "Vox Piscis, or the Book-Fish containing Three Treatises, which were found in the belly of a Cod-Fish in Cambridge Market on Midsummer Eve." Then there is "The Great Green Squishy Mean Bibliovore," a creature envisioned by the children's songwriter Monty Harper. The bibliovore — a cross between a dinosaur and a bookworm — invades a library, where a brave librarian domesticates him by teaching him to read. The bibliovore's fate? According to the lyrics, "Today he makes a living writing book reviews."

Brundibar opens in NYC!

Did you know the Highlights Gallery features a drawing from Maurice Sendak's book Brundibar?

An adaptation of the story was recently revived for the stage and will be performed in New York City beginning in late April at the New Victory Theater. For the book and the new production of the opera, Sendak has teamed up with award-winning playwright Tony Kushner (Angels in America) to tell the story of a brother and sister who are trying to get their hands on some milk for their mother. Brundibar is a children's opera with music written by Hans Krasa (a Czech Jew) and a libretto by Adolf Hoffmeister. It was first performed in the Theresienstadt concentration camp by children, many of whom would later be killed--as was Krasa. While the story ends happily, it cannot be separated from its awful historical context--a juxtaposition that Sendak and Kushner's book captures all too well .

The Rosenbach has purchased tickets for some shows in May--stay tuned for details.

Further information about New York performances can be found on the Victory Theatre website
http://www.newvictory.org/show.m?showID=10047
Additional information about the original opera can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brundibar

Phillis Wheatley Acquisition

On February 28th, 2005, Bill Adair, Director of Education and Catherine Parmar, Associate Director of Education, traveled to the Swann Galleries in New York City for the auction of an issue of The Essex Gazette dated October 1770 that contains an advertisement for an elegiac poem written by Phillis Wheatley on the death of the Rev. George Whitefield. With a well attended event and challenging bidders, the Rosenbach Museum & Library successfully outbid our opponents to purchase this important piece of African American history for our collection.

The Rosenbach’s collection includes Wheatley’s book of poetry published in 1773 which was the first book of poetry written by an African American to be published. This advertisement lists the first printing of an individual poem written by an African American. The text of the advertisement reads, in part:

“To be Sold at the Printing Office (embellished with a plate…) An Elegiac Poem On the Death of that Celebrated Divine, and Eminent Servant of Jesus Christ, the Rev. George Whitefield by Phillis, a Servant Girl of 17 Year of Age, Belonging to Mr. J. Wheatley of Boston:--She has been but 9 years in this country from Africa…”

Surrounding the advertisement are other ads for the return of runaway slaves and the sale of slaves. The Essex Gazette was the first newspaper published outside of Boston and was in print from 1768 to 1775. Wheatley had a letter published in the Gazette in 1774 condemning Christian ministers for not speaking out against slavery. This acquisition provides tangible proof of the environment of slavery from which Wheatley emerged and succeeded in producing a significant publishing landmark. The mundane nature of the slave trade, even in New England, becomes patently clear through the advertisements that surround the Wheatley ad.

The newspaper was issued as four pages (a folio sheet folded), and a search showed that no other copy of this issue has been offered at auction in at least the last 20 years. An RLIN search shows the only copies in other libraries in the collections at the Library of Congress, Berkeley, and the American Antiquarian Society. Having purchased this issue, the Rosenbach owns the sole known copy in a public collection in Philadelphia.

RML’s upcoming exhibition, Look Again: African Americana from the Collections of the Rosenbach Museum & Library, will make immediate use of this object. Our purchase of such an object is proof of RML’s commitment to continued collecting in this subject area at the same time that the exhibition itself will both examine past practices and help us refine future collecting goals within this segment of the collections. The multiple connections between this object and others mentioned above not only give this newspaper further flexibility in its application within RML’s mission-oriented activities, but also reflect what we believe to be a hallmark of the style of collecting practiced by our founders.

Dr. Franklin goes to Washington, D.C.


On March 23rd, the Rosenbach's first printing, first edition, of the 1733 Poor Richard Almanac travelled to the White House for a Franklin birthday celebration hosted by President George W. Bush and First Lady Laura Bush.

The Rosenbach's Board Chairman Bernard Newman and his wife Judy represented the museum at the dinner. Mr. Newman, who was elected Chairman in 2005, is President and CEO of Philadelphia-based Newman & Company, Inc., a 90-year-old family paperboard manufacturing business. Mr. Newman was able to speak with the President at length about the museum and had a wonderful evening overall--he was much impressed by the staff work here that made it possible.

Additional Franklin artifacts traveling to the White House included a 1787 printing of the Constitution of the United States (from the American Philosophical Society), a miniature portrait of Louis XVI owned by Franklin (also from the American Philosophical Society), a tankard owned by Franklin (from the Franklin Institute), and Franklin’s Cato Major, often considered to be the finest example of Franklin’s printing (from the Library Company of Philadelphia).

Further information about this event can be found at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/21/AR2006032101998.html